EXAMINATIONS
POLICY &
PROCEDURES MANUAL
Updated December 2019
Table of Contents
1. DEFINITIONS AND PRINCIPLES
GOVERNING EXAMS
1.1 Formal examinations and their
schedule
1.3 Formative and summative assessment
1.5 Definition of final examination
1.6 Class work contributing to the final exam
1.7 Proportion of work to
be
externally examined
1.8 Opportunities for sitting an exam in the same
series
1.9 Eligibility for examination
2. TYPES OF
EXAMINATION AND THEIR SCHEDULING
2.1 Invigilated examinations in the June and November examination periods
2.2 Class tests, essays and other forms
of assessment as examinations (PC294)
2.3.4 Authority for awarding
deferred examinations
2.3.5 Provisions relating to deferred examinations for student leaders
2.3.8 Notifying students about the award of a deferred examination
2.3.9 Scheduling of deferred examinations
2.4 Supplementary examinations
2.4.3 Forms of supplementary examination
2.4.7 Scheduling of supplementary examinations
2.5 Third Term (winter and summer term) examination periods
2.7 Examination without Attendance (EWA)
3. EXTERNAL EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS
3.1 External examiner requirements for courses
3.2 The use of external examiners for deferred and supplementary examinations
3.3 Appointment of external examiners
3.4 Instructions to external examiners
3.5 Examination papers delivered to a third party
3.6 Reports on departments by external examiners
3.7 Examiners’ names on questions
papers
3.8 Availability
of names of examiners of PhD theses and master’s dissertations
3.9 Payment of external examiners
4. DUE PERFORMANCE (DP) PROCEDURES
5.1 Preserving security and confidentiality of examination and class test question papers
5.2 Identification at examinations
5.3 Presence of academic staff at examinations
5.4 Additional time for reading question papers
5.5 Electronic devices: Use at examinations
5.6 Formula sheets and other printed material
5.7 Dishonesty at examinations
5.8 Examinations
written in languages
other than English
5.9 The retention of examination scripts
5.10 Extra time in examinations
5.11 Misreading of the timetable
6.2 Instructions to Principal invigilators
7. EXAMINATION MARKING REQUIREMENTS
7.1 Publication of Examination requirements
7.3 Marks for Examination Questions
7.4 Accountability for final results
7.5 Range of results in undergraduate courses
7.6 Using student tutors to mark undergraduate work
8. CALCULATION AND DETERMINATION OF EXAMINATION RESULTS
8.1 Calculation of examination results
8.3 Changes to provisional results
9. PUBLICATION OF EXAMINATION RESULTS
9.1 Official publication of results
9.2 Form of publication of examination results
9.3 Publication of provisional examination results
9.5 Publication of results of essays, assignments etc
9.6 Student access to class test scripts and assignments
9.7 Student access to examination scripts
9.8 Public access to results and student records (PC02/2014)
10.1 Length and pattern of the academic year
10.2 Hierarchy of principles in construction of the examination timetable
10.3 Students registered for two courses in the same lecture period
10.4 Faculty or Departmental timetables
10.5 Examination arrangements for new courses
10.6 Examination in courses requiring more time for marking or re-examination
10.7 Practical performance-based examinations
10.8 Final date for deferred and supplementary examinations
10.9 Dates by which timetable is to be published
10.10 Authority to make changes to the final timetables
10.11 Venues for Examinations and Class Tests: Sitting
examinations at centres other than Cape Town
10.12 Scheduling of class
tests and
their inclusion in the mid-year examination time-table
APPENDIX
A: INSTRUCTIONS TO PRINCIPAL INVIGILATORS
APPENDIX
B: APPLICATION TO CHECK AN EXAMINATION
SCRIPT
APPENDIX
C: A GUIDE FOR EXAMINERS
APPENDIX
D: GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION WITHOUT ATTENDANCE
APPENDIX E: ONLINE EXAMINATION GUIDELINES
APPENDIX F: GUIDELINES FOR SUBMISSION OF ELECTRONIC EXAMINATIONS
APPENDIX G: EXAMINATION QUESTION PAPER CHECKLIST
APPENDIX H: EXAMINATION PAPER PRINTING LOG SHEET
APPENDIX I:
INSTRUCTIONS TO PRINCIPAL INVIGILATORS FOR ONLINE EXAMINATIONS
The
University has formal examinations in May/June, and in October/November, at such other times as the Senate decides, and
in January (supplementary and
deferred examinations).
Examinations
are held in all courses to assess work done by students.
Examinations can take the form of formative assessment or summative assessment and can consist of written examinations, class tests, essays, assignments and other forms of assessment.
·
Formative assessment typically refers to assessments used as part
of the teaching and learning process where the marks do not, and are not intended
to, contribute to the result for the course. Examples include class tests and essays.
·
Summative assessment is used as a part of the formal final assessment.
Marks obtained will contribute to the result of the course in such proportions as may be
determined by Senate.
All tests that contribute to the final result in the course are defined as examinations for the purposes of this procedures manual.
As used in this document, ‘final examination’ describes the summative assessment, comprising a single examination for each course, that is scheduled to be held during the June and November examination periods (or at such other times as Senate decides) and which is written under invigilation.
(PC05/2003)
The
composition of elements of the final mark is decided by the Faculty Board on authority delegated by Senate.
Where groupwork contributes to the final mark, this must be made explicit.
For
undergraduate courses where a faculty has not determined otherwise, at least 50% of
the final result must be derived from the formal invigilated examination.
Where classwork and other forms of assessment are to contribute more or less than 50%, explicit permission must be obtained from the Faculty Board for that course, and at least 50% of the
examinable work must be made available to the external examiner.
(PC05/2003)
At least 50% of the work that constitutes the final mark is to be externally examined. Where the invigilated
examination constitutes less
than 50% of the final
mark, coursework must be retained
and submitted to the external examiner.
A candidate should not have
more than two opportunities of
sitting an examination in the same series. A series is defined as
a normal examination and
the deferred/supplementary examination that follows. A deferred or supplementary
examination is itself the second
opportunity of sitting
the examination. No candidate may be granted a supplementary examination based on the result obtained in this second opportunity (be it a deferred or a supplementary examination).
No department may refuse a student a deferred examination if this has been granted by the Deferred Examinations
Committee.
Where a candidate is granted a supplementary examination, the Course Results
Schedule (CRS) records both the result of the second-opportunity examination, and the fact of its being a second opportunity result. (See 2.4
Supplementary examinations and 8.5 Classification of results.)
Where a candidate is granted a deferred examination, the CRS will show only the final result, and not
the fact that it was taken
as a deferred opportunity.
Departments are responsible for ensuring that only registered students participate in and submit work for assessment in a course. No work submitted by an unregistered student may be marked or returned.
Senate must determine the form of each examination (whether written or oral or both, and whether it will include practical work or clinical work, or both). Senate determines the dates by which departments must post all results on the system after each examination cycle. All coursework must be marked in time to meet these predetermined deadlines. All results (including supplementary and deferred exams) must be posted by a date in January of the subsequent year. No marks may be outstanding by the start of the subsequent academic year. (G20.5)
An invigilated exam is one taken under supervision. Invigilated examinations are held in May/June and October/November and at such other times as Senate decides.
No coursework (e.g. essays, assignments) may be
scheduled in the examination period or the preceding consolidation
period. The only exception to this is June class
tests for courses with a W, H or Z suffix. (See 2.2 Class tests, essays and other
forms of assessment as examinations.)
Unless Senate gives special permission, no more than one final examination in an undergraduate course is allowed in any examination period.
(Where a course allows students to select optional modules, each module will be examined. This may mean that more than two examinations will be required for the course; but it may
not be arranged in such a way
that any one student has to sit more than one examination for the course. If this necessitates a course having to use more than one timetable slot, it may be only organised with the permission of the Senate Teaching and Examination Timetable Sub-Committee).
Class tests may serve two purposes: formative and summative. First, a class test may be used simply as part of the teaching and learning process, where the marks do not, and are not intended to, contribute to
the result for the course. Second,
a class test
may, in addition
to its part in the teaching
and learning process, be used as a part of the formal final assessment. In such cases the marks obtained in the class test will
contribute to the result of the course,
in such proportions
as may be determined
by
Senate.
The above apply equally to
essays and other forms of assessment.
The Examinations Officer may schedule June class tests for W and H suffix courses in the June examination period. No coursework other than tests for W and H suffix courses may
be scheduled in the June examination period
or the preceding consolidation period.
June examinations (as opposed to class tests) may
be scheduled during the June examination period for courses that
run
over the whole year i.e. H
and W suffix courses).
2.3.1 A deferred examination is a further final examination opportunity granted on medical,
compassionate, religious or political grounds.
2.3.2 The form of a deferred examination is to be the same
as
the form of the
original examination to
which it relates, but if a department should
propose to alter
the form of the
examination in exceptional circumstances (e.g. from written to oral), such proposal will
be subject to the
prior agreement
of the Faculty Board and
all the candidates concerned. (PC408)
2.3.3 The rules for deferred exams are set out in the General Rules for Degrees, Diplomas and Certificates. (See also 10.2 Hierarchy of principles in construction of the examination timetable.)
In all applications
for deferred examinations in courses where no Due
Performance (DP) requirement is set, the opinion of the department, particularly concerning
the student’s academic record, is requested and taken into consideration.
In courses where a DP requirement is set, the student’s DP status will stand as an indication of the student’s academic record and the department will not be
asked to give a further indication of the student’s standing. A student wishing to apply for a deferred examination must complete the application form and submit it, together with any
substantiating documents, to the Student Records Office no later than seven days after the scheduled examination.
Applications
for deferred examinations are considered by
the Deferred Examinations Committee in terms of the general university rules for
degrees, diplomas and certificates. No
department may
refuse a student a
deferred examination if
this has been granted by
the Deferred Examinations Committee.
(Senate 4/1983, PC06/1988)
(a) The Deferred Examinations committee, sitting with the Executive Director responsible for student affairs present, may grant a deferred examination in special circumstances where the student has been involved in official bona fide activities related to the administration of student affairs or the University generally.
(b) In considering an application for deferment in such cases the Committee shall satisfy itself that the student’s contribution has been substantial. Senate envisages that few students, perhaps no more than two or three each year, will be allowed such a deferment of examinations.
Eligibility for receiving
a concession is not confined
to particular Student Representative Council (SRC) office bearers.
2.3.6 A supplementary examination cannot be deferred. If,
for any reason,
a student is not present to
take a supplementary examination, he or she forfeits the opportunity
and
the original fail mark stands. (See also 8.5 Classification of
results.)
2.3.7 An examination without attendance (EWA) cannot be deferred.
To ensure that the student is advised
in time, information is sent by email to the student’s myuct address.
Students must be given notice of a deferred or supplementary exam two weeks in advance.
Note: Where departments arrange the supplementary and deferred examination dates, it is recommended that they follow the
practice, used in the Examinations
office, of publishing the date on a website (Vula) and informing the students by email.
Deferred examinations are normally
held in January with the supplementary examinations,
but may also be scheduled at
another time arranged by
the department. Alternatively, Senate may allow a deferred examination to be held at
some other date. (PC410)
Where a department arranges a deferred examination outside of the
January examination period, the department must notify the students of the date, time and venue of the exam at least
2 weeks prior to the actual exam.
A shorter notice period agreed upon by
the department and student/s will be allowed provided that the student/s is made aware of the right
to at least two weeks’ notice of the exam. The student must
be notified in writing and the date, time
and venue must
be communicated to the
Examinations Office for posting on the exams website.
The
General Rules on deferred examinations are to be published on departmental noticeboards with the examinations timetable.
(PC386)
2.4.1 A supplementary examination is a further examination granted on academic grounds to a student who has failed the course.
2.4.2 Supplementary examinations are not available on all courses. In courses in which they are allowed, supplementary examinations are granted on behalf of Senate by the Faculty Examinations Committee (FEC), within the eligibility rules of the Faculty and after considering the recommendation of the academic department concerned. The FEC decides on the awarding of a supplementary examination on recommendation of the department.
The form of a supplementary examination is decided by Senate and must be the same form as the original examination to which it relates. (PC408)
The results for students who are granted supplementary examinations can be calculated in one of the following ways depending on the form of the examination. How the results are to be calculated must be decided by the Faculty Board on the recommendation of the Head of Department and conveyed to the students. Forms of supplementary examination include:
(i)
As a stand-alone examination: the final mark is based only on the outcome of the
supplementary examination and no coursework is included in the calculation.
(ii)
As a composite which includes the
coursework: the supplementary mark replaces the examination mark while retaining the proportion that
coursework and the examination contribute to the final mark.
(iii)
As a composite which includes
coursework and the original (failed) examination result: the original and supplementary examinations are averaged to establish ‘the examination’
mark, and this is then combined with the
coursework to determine the final mark.
In
cases where the supplementary examination examined only a particular section of the work covered
by the original examination, the supplementary examination may
be used to substitute for the failed section in the examination. (This could only be used where the student passed overall but failed to get a sub-minimum
on a section.)
In deciding the result of a course for which a candidate took a supplementary examination, the original result as well as the class work which did not form part of the examination may be taken into account. (PC01/2007) (See also Section 8 on calculating results.)
2.4.4 No supplementary examination will
be granted on a deferred examination.
2.4.5 No supplementary examination will
be granted for
an examination without attendance (EWA).
2.4.6 Supplementary examination are not offered for third term (summer term or winter term) courses.
All supplementary examinations for year and second semester courses are held during
January or, where this is not a suitable time, at such other time as may be decided by Senate. Supplementary examinations for
first semester
courses may be held
in the
second semester, January
or in
the November examinations session where this can be accommodated. (PC410)
Where a department arranges a supplementary examination outside of the
January examination period, the department must notify the students of the date, time and venue of the exam at least
2 weeks prior to the actual exam.
A shorter notice period agreed upon by
the department and student/s will be allowed provided that the student/s is made aware of the right
to at least two weeks’ notice of the exam. The student must
be notified in writing and the date, time
and venue must
be communicated to the
Examinations Office for posting on the exams website.
The
General Rules on supplementary examinations are to be published on departmental noticeboards with the examinations timetable.
(PC386)
Note: Where departments arrange the supplementary and deferred examination dates, it is recommended that they follow the
practice, used in the Examinations
office, of publishing the date on a website (Vula) and informing the students by email.
Final examinations for third term courses are normally held
immediately after the completion of the course in July (for winter term) and December (for summer term). Where summer term courses finish in finish in January, the examinations are held then.
No supplementary examinations are granted on third term courses. A deferred examination may be granted in
terms of the rules on deferred examinations for third term
examinations.
Examinations which include a component outside of invigilated conditions are permitted where a faculty has decided on a sound practice and
the
examination has
received
faculty endorsement.
(e.g. A case study is handed out
the day before the exam and students bring this with them to the examination venue where they receive the requirements and sit the written component of the examination under
invigilation.)
Senate may allow a student who is repeating a course to take the examination in the course
without re-attendance
at
classes, under
special circumstances. In such cases, Senate will
specify which (if any) of the course requirements the student will be required to complete, in addition to the examination(s).
No supplementary or deferred examination is granted on an
EWA.
Online examinations are permitted where the exam will be taken under invigilation.
The same rigor applied to paper based invigilation rules must be followed
to ensure the integrity of online tests. (See Appendix A:
Instructions to Principal invigilators)
Due diligence must be applied in considering possible risks and technical measures to prevent cheating. (See Appendix E: Online examination guidelines for risks to be considered.)
Online examinations should preferably take place during office hours but where
required after hours, a
technician
must
be present to assist with any technical queries and/or problems that are reported.
The setup and configuration of online examinations must be conducted in consultation with CILT,
ICTS[1] and faculty IT staff in advance. (See Appendix F: Guidelines for submission of
electronic examinations.)
(PC06/2014)
Examinations are held on campus, but may be held at locations elsewhere for students taking distance or block release offerings. In all locations examinations are to be conducted under the conditions specified by Senate to ensure their integrity and security. (See also 10.11 Venues for examinations and class tests.)
Individual students seeking permission to write on-campus exams elsewhere must do so in terms of General Rule G20.10.
All examinations, in all courses, must be externally examined. This applies to semester courses, whole year courses, and third term courses (summer and winter terms); and to class
tests, deferred examinations and supplementary examinations.
An external examiner is ordinarily
somebody who is external to the University
and
has no current or recent affiliation to the University.
In rare cases where it can be shown that no
suitably qualified person, external to the University,
can
be found to examine a particular course, Senate may approve the appointment of an examiner external to the department concerned.
Such a person must not have taught
the students to be examined.
(PC376)
Deferred and supplementary examinations will be externally examined in the same manner as all
other final examinations.
It is desirable that
the external examiners for
regular
examination of a particular
course should
also be the external examiner for
the deferred and supplementary examination in that course. Where this is not possible, a
second external examiner
who is available at the required times, must be found for the
deferred and supplementary examinations. (See section 2.3 on Deferred examinations and
2.4 on Supplementary examinations.)
External examiners must be approved in advance by
the Faculty Board acting on authority delegated
by
Senate.
An external examiner should be
appointed for a period of no more
than five
consecutive years, but may be reappointed after a break.
(PC04/1989, PC05/1992)
Instructions to external examiners are approved by the Faculty Board, and issued to all external examiners by
the Faculty Office (Academic Administration). Faculty instructions must be based on the
Senate-approved
memorandum for external examiners. (See Appendix
C: A guide for examiners, section on ‘The role of the external examiner’)
Where a set of examination papers is sent by courier or other means to an external examiner, the department must record
all marks beforehand.
(PC02/1988)
All external examiners are required, as part of their
function, to present a confidential report on
the quality of the curriculum of the department, as far as they
can judge from the estimations of the undergraduate, honours and postgraduate students in the department.
These mandatory, confidential reports are to be sent to the
Head of Department in the first instance, who forwards them, with a
brief
commentary, to the Dean or his or her nominee, who
then reviews and sends a summary report to the
responsible Executive Officer.
Reports are also
required for courses in coursework masters’ programmes.
This procedure serves to keep Deans and Executive Officers informed annually of departmental
functions and allows
remedial
action, if necessary, before
serious
and
perhaps permanent damage is done to students in training and the department as a whole. It is a quality
assurance procedure.
(PC433)
A Head of Department may decide
whether or not to publish internal
and/or external examiners’ names on his or her department’s examination questions papers. It is expected that external examiners give consent
before their names are published.
The names and full reports of
examiners are given to successful candidates for
the degree of Doctor
of Philosophy. The
Doctoral Degrees Board Office informs potential examiners of this
policy when inviting them to accept appointment, and asks them whether they would object to
this practice.
(PC02/1988)
An external examiner is paid a fee if he or she is external to the University. A member of the University staff is not paid a fee for acting as
an
external examiner.
To receive payment, the external examiner must have been duly approved and appointed by the Faculty Board acting
on authority delegated by Senate, and must have submitted the claim form as
described in the
payment
process.
(SENATE 8/9/1970, PC422, PC431)
(See also Rule GB9, General Rules and Policies, Handbook3)
4.1 The conditions for the award of a Duly Performed (DP) certificate for a course shall be approved by the relevant Faculty Board.
The conditions governing the award of DP certificates shall be published in the Faculty Handbook and course outline issued at the start of the course.
If the DP conditions need to be
changed for any reason after the start of the course and the Dean allows this, all students must be informed in writing of the change, and sign acknowledging the written notification of the
change.
4.2 Departments must publish a list of those who have been refused or granted DP certificates (or both depending on what is most practicable) on their departmental or electronic noticeboards (Vula) on or before the last teaching day of the semester or year.
(See
also Appendix C: A guide for examiners.)
The Head of Department (HoD) is responsible for preserving confidentiality and security in formal examination or class test papers prepared in his or her department. The Deputy Registrar holds responsibility for maintaining security and confidentiality in the Examinations Office when copying of formal examination papers is conducted there, and when question papers are dispatched from the Examinations Office.
Senate makes provision for the HoD to appoint a person to act in specified ways to ensure the security of examinations written off-campus. (PC09/2014) (See Appendix E: Online examination guidelines for guidance on security arrangements for off-campus examinations.)
The Examinations Office is not responsible for the security or copying of class tests.
The Head of Department is responsible for compiling examination papers, and the Head of Department or the Deputy Registrar is accountable for copying, storing, and dispatching the papers to examination venues. This includes the following:
5.1.1 Security in the compiling and dispatching of draft formal examination or class test examination papers to external examiners. The use of email is acceptable provided that the
document is password-protected and the
password is sent separately. If the document
is not password-protected, this must immediately be reported to the Head
of Department or Examinations Officer, who will investigate and decide whether there has been a
breach that compromises security. The departmental administrator who sets up the
password must circulate
the password to affected Examiners in a
separate
communication.
5.1.2 Once the paper has been approved, the HoD must keep a paper trail related to the formal examination or class test examination papers for auditing and quality assurance purposes. HoDs may wish to use a similar checklist for papers
printed in departments. (See Appendix G: Examination question paper checklist
for the checklist to be completed for all formal examination papers printed by
the Examinations Office.)
5.1.3 Heads of Departments must ensure that copies of formal examination or class test examination papers are securely locked
away at
all times, and that no persons
have unauthorised access to
them. Duplicate
keys must be under the sole control of the Head of Department. Care
must be taken to ensure that the type of lock used will provide security. Ordinary cupboard and filing cabinet
locks are unacceptable.
(Heads of Departments should contact the Deputy Registrar if in doubt about adequate physical security arrangements. Heads of Departments should pay particular attention to
the security
of examination questions stored electronically: for example, these should
not be stored in a form to which others
may
obtain access.)
5.1.4 Heads must ensure that the copying of formal examination or class test examination papers does
not happen off campus, nor is contracted out to third parties. Only departmental machines, the
Examinations Office or the University’s copy services may be used. If the latter, the paper may
not be left with the copy services.
5.1.5 The number of persons engaged in the typing and/or duplicating of formal examination or class test examination papers must
be kept to the absolute
minimum. A minimum of two people is required for the printing of formal examination or class test examination papers to ensure that a second count of printed papers takes place. If papers are printed
by the University’s copy service, a representative of the department must
be present for the duration of the printing.
Students and student tutors may
not assist with the printing of formal examination or
class test examination papers. All
staff present must sign a register indicating their attendance.
5.1.6 The process of copying formal examination or class test examination papers must
be supervised at all times.
Care must be
taken that all copies of formal examination or class test
examination papers (including master and spoilt copies, whether intermediate draft or final) are removed from the copier, and securely locked away until they are destroyed.
This includes master and spoilt copies of papers whether intermediate
draft or final. A register must
be kept of the number of copies made and this should be reconciled against
paper copies to maintain track of each paper. In cases where a printer stores print jobs
in the memory, the main file must
be deleted from
the memory after printing.
(See Appendix H: Examination paper printing log sheet for a copy of
the reconciliation register used in the Examinations Office.)
5.1.7 Spoilt or surplus formal examination or class test examination papers must be appropriately destroyed (e.g. by shredding or incinerating the papers). This includes all master and spoilt copies, whether intermediate draft or final.
5.1.8 Relatives, or persons with any close personal
relationship with a student writing an
examination, must not be involved in the compiling, typing and/or copying of
examination papers.
5.1.9 In the case where a department printing its own formal examination papers does not have secure storage facilities, the papers must be delivered to the Examinations Office for storage immediately after
printing. All papers must be
delivered at least 48 hours
prior to the relevant formal examination, and be packed in the format requested by
the Examinations Office.
5.1.10 With the exception of Multiple Choice Question (MQC) papers, all previous formal examination question papers must be made available to
students to
help them prepare. Departments are
responsible for
uploading a
PDF version of their examination papers to the tab
on course Vula site
called “Electronic Exam Papers”. A hard copy of
all examination papers printed by the Examinations Office will
be sent to Archives.
(PC437, PC0719/1991)
Students are required to present their student registration cards at all University examinations.
(See Rule G20.13, Examinations
Rules, General Rules and Policies, Handbook 3)
5.2.1 If a student fails to present his or her student registration card at an examination written on campus, and cannot be identified by a departmental representative, he or she will be required to produce his or her student registration card within 5 working days to the relevant department. If the student fails to do so, his/her results for that examination in the subject involved will be cancelled. The warning of this penalty will be printed on the EO01 form (Failure to produce a student card) which he or she is required to complete in the examination room.)
5.2.2 If a student fails to present his or her student registration card for an examination written off campus, he or she will be required to produce satisfactory alternative identification (identity document, passport, driver’s license) to the Principal invigilator, complete the standard documentation for the record, and be photographed by the Principal invigilator.
The Principal invigilator must submit a
scanned copy of
the alternative identification offered, and the photograph taken at the
examination, to the Head of Department or
nominee within 24 hours of the examination.
The Head of
Department or
nominee will
match the scanned alternative identification and
photograph to the certified identification held on system for
that student to
authenticate the
writer.
5.2.3 A student whose
examination result is cancelled because he or she has failed to present
his or her registration card in terms of 5.2.2 may apply
for the reinstatement of his or
her result by application in writing to the Registrar by no later than the 28 February next
(in the case of an examination
held in the second half of the previous year) or 31
July next (in the
case of the examination held in the first half
of the year). Such application
must be accompanied by the prescribed fee (non-refundable) for each course involved. The result will be reinstated if he
or she can show to the satisfaction of the Registrar (or officer designated by
the
Registrar) that he or she is the person who wrote the
examination in question.
(Senate 11/6/1968)
The course convener or an authorised representative able
to deal with substantive issues relating to the paper must be available to attend each venue where the paper is being written (including the extra time venue) when papers from his or her department are handed out, and
must collect, or make adequate arrangements for the collection,
of scripts from all venues after the examination.
The course convener or authorised representative should at
least be on call telephonically
throughout the duration of
the examination. His or her contact details must be listed on the
Examinations website along with all
invigilators’ details.
(PC288, PC433)
As there are advantages in having consistency in examination procedures, examinations involving extra time for reading should not normally be held at the same time and venue as examinations
which do not include this
allowance.
5.4.1 This extra time must be clearly shown on the question paper and recorded on the Examinations website as part of the duration of the paper.
5.4.2 The Examinations Officer must be informed prior to the preparation of the timetable so that
the full length of the examination may be shown
on the timetable.
5.4.3 If it is necessary to hold such examinations at the same time and venue as examinations which do not have this allowance, all such examinations must start simultaneously so that those candidates who have not received extra
time will leave the
hall before those who have.
(PC406)
The nature and use of programmable electronic devices is to be decided by the course convener and/or examiner and indicated on the cover of the examination paper. Students are to be advised of this
in advance.
The unauthorised taking of stored information in a device into an examination is a dishonest practice in respect
of which disciplinary action will be taken.
All examiners must ensure that there is no breach of integrity through the use of any device during the examinations.
Formula sheets and other printed material may be used in an examination if allowed by the examiner. If printed material or formula sheets are
allowed, the cover page
of the examination question paper must specify clearly what may be used.
If formula
sheets are to be
used, it is advisable that these are issued to the
students in the examination venue. Where students are allowed to bring formula sheets into
the examination:
·
students must
have been given a clear indication in advance of what may
be included on a formula sheet;
·
all formula sheets
are to be handed in with the answer script.
Dictionaries are not allowed unless the examiner has indicated otherwise.
During an examination candidates are prohibited from having on their persons any
electronic device other than
what has been specifically allowed.
(See also Rule G20.11 & G20.12 of the rules for examinations, General Rules and Policies, Handbook 3).
Departments which consider it probable that dishonesty has occurred in any form of examination must submit a report on students involved to the Vice-Chancellor for action in accordance with the rules on disciplinary jurisdiction and procedures.
Note: A class test and any other form of assessment contributing to a final result is an examination for the purpose of this rule.
A candidate in a language and literature department may be required to answer in the language
of the subject. A candidate for any other examination must answer in
English.
(PC04/1989)
The Head of
Department must keep examination scripts until 01 April for all examinations/class
tests (including deferred and supplementary examinations)
taken in respect of the previous academic year. The
decision
to keep scripts beyond this date rests with the Head
of Department. All class tests are handed back to the student unless they are to be retained for the
external examiner. (See rule G24.3
of General Rules and Policies handbook.)
Senate recognises that a student with a learning or physical disability may require extra time. Senate
will consider, in its absolute discretion, applications from students for extra
time in examinations and may grant extra time to a student who has a learning or physical disability. (An examination for the purpose of this rule includes class tests that contribute to the final result in a course.)
(GB31/10/19 77, PC11/88)
Misreading of the timetable will not be condoned or accepted as grounds for a deferred examination. Where appropriate, a department may recommend an examination without attendance (EWA) to the Faculty Examinations Committee.
(See rule G20.9 in General Rules and
Policies.)
(PC 9/2006, PC1/2007
and
PC12/2009)
The rules regarding invigilation are as follows:
6.1.1 The Examinations Officer will advise the departments of the number of invigilators needed for
each examination and venue (see 6.1.5). The
nomination of invigilation sessions
is done by the Head of Department (HoD) or nominee (the responsible person in the department).
In the case
of examinations written off
campus, the HoD may
appoint invigilators who
are employees at another university, or of a third party provider.
The Examinations Officer must be informed of the names of all invigilators and the Principal invigilator
for each examination and
venue by the
set date.
6.1.3 Remaining invigilation tasks may be assigned to staff outside of their job descriptions,
tutors, and other part time staff, and must be
remunerated at a fair rate. These payments will
be made from faculty funds.
6.1.4 Invigilators are to be provided for each session
as per the following guidelines: Two
invigilators for the first fifty
students and one additional invigilator for every additional fifty students (or part thereof). At least one male and one female invigilator must be present in
each venue. This ratio should
be used as a guideline for
providing invigilators for class tests.
6.1.5 The Principal invigilator or an appointed nominee is
responsible for
the collection of the exam papers from
the Examinations Office before each examination session. If there is a lockable safe in
the department the Principal
invigilator or nominee is allowed to collect the
examination papers for the entire examination period.
(See Appendix A: Instructions to Principal Invigilators)
6.2.1 ‘Instructions to Principal Invigilators’ are revised and approved by the Senate Examinations and Assessment Committee from time to time and will be issued to the Head of Department (HoD) before each diet of examinations. The HoD is to ensure that all Principal, and other, invigilators receive the instructions in advance. The Principal invigilators are responsible for ensuring that other invigilators at that examination session, and students, are aware of and observe the rules that govern student and invigilator behaviour during examinations. The HoD is to arrange for appropriate training when needed.
6.2.2 Principal invigilators are required to report any irregularity to the Vice-Chancellor or nominee in writing immediately after the session.
(Senate 9/1970)
Departmental requirements for examinations, e.g. sub minima for certain specified papers must be approved by the Faculty Board and Senate and published in the Faculty
Handbook and the course outline
issued at the start
of the course.
(PC01/2004)
Scripts of final written examinations taken under invigilated conditions are to be marked anonymously, on the basis that the method to be used may be determined at faculty level to be approved by Senate.
(PC433)
Where a question is divided into smaller parts, marks must be clearly allocated to each subdivision.
(PC10/2016)
The course convener is accountable for the final results and must ensure that appropriate steps are taken to validate
the accuracy of all uploaded results.
(PC09/1988)
To counter the long-standing and continuing reluctance on the part of many to use the whole
mark range (of between 0 – 100), both at the
bottom and the top
ends, examiners are asked to
make use of the full
range when examining.
(PC05A/2017)
The course convener is accountable for the marking of all student work (examinations as well as
coursework where the mark contributes to the final course mark).
Ideally, the course conveners or other lecturers will do the marking themselves
as marking provides them with valuable feedback on the teaching and learning in a course. It is, however, not possible in
the large classes for the marking to be done solely by the course convener or
other lecturers who participated in teaching the course.
Where the class size necessitates that student tutors (postgraduate or undergraduate) be used, the following guidelines apply.
·
Preference
should be given to suitable postgraduate tutors but where no suitable postgraduate tutors are
available, undergraduate tutors may be used.
·
The
HoD must ascertain in advance whether student tutors will be used to
assist with the marking. The HoD must be given
the names of the student
tutors involved, an
indication of which assessments (tests, essays, exams) they will be marking, and an indication of the number of
scripts (tests, essays or exams) or questions each
student tutor will be marking.
·
Student
tutors who will be required to mark in addition to tutoring, must be given
appropriate training to enable them to mark and provide useful
feedback on the work marked in the case of in-course assessment.
·
Where
student tutors are used it is
expected that the convener calibrates the marking before the marking begins to ensure that all student
tutors are clear on what is
expected, and the marking is consistent. The convener is expected to moderate
extensively the work marked by student tutors to ensure the quality and
consistency. In the case of in-course assessments, the course convener should also obtain feedback from student
tutors on the common errors or weaknesses in the scripts so that where necessary this can be recapped
with the class.
·
The
HoD, having ensured that
guidelines 1-4 have been appropriately applied, must inform the Dean of the courses where student tutors were used to mark.
(Senate 03/07/2017, PC08a/2017)
The calculation of the final result is the final step in the examination process and thus forms part of the academic activity of assessment.
Calculating the
mark includes tallying marks for individual
questions or exam components, checking that formulae used to
derive the final result from the weighting of course components are accurate, and
deciding the final mark or course result. (See separate guide for
dissertations and PhD theses.)
Administrators may assist by
transcribing the final mark into the PeopleSoft course
results record.
(PC02/1987, PC09/1988, PC04/1992)
8.2.1 Senate may appoint one or more Faculty Examinations Committees in each faculty and will delegate power to those Faculty Examinations Committees to:
·
decide examination results;
·
award degrees (other than the PhD and all other doctorates) diplomas and certificates within the terms of
Senate approved rules;
·
decide whether, or not, to refuse readmission to a student who fails to satisfy the minimum requirements for
readmission;
·
re-admit students who have not
met the minimum requirements for readmission;
·
assign a progression
status to all students;
·
award supplementary examinations.
8.2.2 Each Faculty Board proposes to Senate the composition of its Faculty Examinations Committee(s). (This could be the full Faculty Board or a smaller committee).
8.2.3 Faculty Examinations Committees are required to report the names of qualifiers to the June and December meeting of the Senate Executive Committee (SEC). Deans and the Chair of the Doctoral Degrees Board (DDB) are required to report to this meeting any:
·
outstanding results subject to a Senate concession;
·
potential qualifiers not approved by the Faculty Examinations
Committees;
·
proposals for concessions.
8.2.4 The Senate Executive Committee has power delegated to it by Senate to
·
confirm examination results;
·
award degrees, diplomas and certificates;
·
grant concessions;
·
finalise the lists of qualifiers for admission to degrees, diplomas and certificates at the April and
December ceremonies.
8.2.5 Any proposed result, not subject to a Senate concession, which is not reported to the Faculty Examinations Committee, is to be reported to the Dean. A Dean has power delegated to him or her to:
(a) approve results,
not subject to Senate concessions, received
after
the Faculty Examinations
Committee meeting;
(b) award degrees (other than the PhD and other doctorates) diplomas and certificates,
where results are received: after the SEC meeting where the Senate List of Qualifiers (SLQ) was approved; after the
January supplementary and deferred examinations;
during the year when
the
Faculty Examinations Committee (FEC) is not scheduled to meet.
Degrees, diplomas and certificates so awarded must be noted
for
information in the Dean’s Circular, and / or reported at
the next meeting of the FEC;
(c) refer any such proposed result to a full meeting of his or her Faculty Examinations
Committee.
(PC05/1991)
A result is provisional until confirmed by the Faculty Examinations Committee
(FEC), the Senate Executive
Committee (SEC), the Doctoral
Degrees Board (DDB), or the Dean as the case may be.
The authority confirming a provisional result may change the result if:
a) a
clerical error has been
detected;
b) an
examiner’s error has been
detected;
c) the
external examiner proposes
a change;
d) the
department proposes
a change;
e) a member of the Faculty Examinations
Committee, after considering the student’s
performance in other courses,
proposes a change.
A result is final once confirmed by the Faculty Examinations Committee
(FEC), the Senate Executive
Committee (SEC), the Doctoral
Degrees Board (DDB), or the Dean as the case may be.
The Dean may change a final result if:
(a) a clerical error has
been detected;
or
(b) an examiner’s error has been
detected,
but must report any such changes in the
Dean’s Circular.
Any correction to
student results must be submitted to the Faculty Office (Academic Administration) or the Examinations
Office for
capturing. This must be accompanied by a
signed “Change of result” form.
Results are
classified and published as follows in all courses for bachelor and honours degrees and for diplomas and certificates:
75% to 100% First Class
70 - 74% Second
Class (Division One)
60 – 69% Second
Class (Division Two)
50 – 59% Third
Class
Under 50% Fail
Where a percentage
result is not obtained, a student’s status may be reflected
as:
Pass results symbols
PA Pass
UP Unclassified
Pass (a condoned pass
or a supplementary examination written on academic grounds is graded as an Unclassified Pass)
SP Pass result obtained via a supplementary examination
Fail results symbols
F Fail
FS Failed,
but permitted to write a supplementary examination on academic grounds
SF Supplementary examination failed
ASF Failed, absent from
supplementary examination
UF SM Unclassified fail, sub minimum not
met
OSS Sub minima failed, supplementary examination awarded
Other results symbols
DPR Duly performed certificate
refused (not permitted to write the examination)
AB Absent from the course or examination
DE Permitted
to write a deferred examination in this course on medical,
religious, political or other good cause
OS Result not yet available
GIP Course still in progress,
result expected in a
subsequent term
LOA Leave of absence
ATT Course attended
INC Incomplete: course not completed
EXA Excluded from assessment
NOTE: DPR, AB and INC are fail results.
The only results published and
entered
on a student’s record are:
(a) The result for the course approved by the Faculty Board or Examinations Committee, and
(b) The result for the course approved by the Faculty Board or Examinations
Committee following a deferred or supplementary examination.
(Senate 18/8/1987)
Until and including 1987, examination percentage marks were not disclosed to students. Academic transcripts issued to students do not include percentage marks
obtained prior to 1988,
but only classified results.
For all examinations:
9.2.1 Percentages are published as the final result. The sole exception is the result for a supplementary exam where a percentage is recorded only if the examination is failed. Where the examination is passed, the result is recorded on system as a percentage (and will be accessible to the FEC and faculty advisors) but will be published on the student’s transcript as an unclassified pass (UP), and a mark of 50% is used for the purpose of calculating the grade point average (GPA). (PC01/2007, PC01/2008)
9.2.3 Classification into grades
is automatic. (See 8.5 Classification of
results.)
The decision
whether or not to publish provisional results on departmental notice boards at the end of the first or second
semester rests with the
Head of Department (PC235). Where this is done the publication of provisional results includes the provisional
percentage mark. (PC09/1988)
Where conducted, the publication of provisional results is
for students’ information only. Provisional results must not be published until the results have been
confirmed by the external examiner.
Provisional examination results are accessible
to students via
the self-service login from the time that they are posted by the departmental marks processors. Student access to the self-service login may be suspended for a limited period by
the Deputy Registrar: Academic Administration in consultation with the
Director: Student Systems Support to ensure system availability for departmental
and faculty users.
(PC412, PC415, PC05/1991)
The provisional results of
mid-year formal examinations are
to be submitted and uploaded by departments by the date stipulated in the
University calendar. The results of class
tests for year-long courses that
count towards the year mark written in the first semester are to
be published on
departmental notice boards as soon as possible, but not later than the date
on which examination results
for
first semester courses are to be uploaded.
(PC445)
It is practice to
divulge to students the marks given for all forms of assessment, whether
or not such work contributes to the final result for the course.
(PC05/1991)
A class test is a
form of assessment, whether counting
towards the final result or not, which is scheduled by the department during the teaching term.
Departments must allow students to see corrected class test/assignment
scripts to:
(a) provide feedback to students on their performance before they are next examined on the same work;
(b) give them the opportunity to detect errors in both marking and transcription,
which could occur.
Where work is
examined under invigilation, the scripts will be retained
by the department concerned until 01 April of the
following year, and will not be returned to the student.
All class tests are handed back to the student unless they are
to be retained for the external examiner.
A student may, by 30
September for first semester examinations whose results have been formally confirmed by the
Faculty Examinations Committee (FEC), or by 31 March of the following year for second semester examinations
or first semester examinations whose results were only confirmed by the FEC in
December:
(a) apply
to the department for a copy of the script(s) which
must be made available on payment of the prescribed fee; and/or;
(b) apply
to the department to be allowed to see his or her script.
The purpose of such
access is to create a learning opportunity.
It is not the purpose to negotiate the mark allocated.
As a matter of policy, the University will publish on the web,
a register of all past
and
present students and that:
a) this will distinguish (e.g., by colour) whether the person is a fee debtor, a current
student or a past student;
b) where a student or past student is a fee debtor by clicking on the student name, you
will be told that results/qualifications are not available and that
further inquiries may be made to the Student records Office;
c) by clicking on any other past student’s name, you would open a
report
·
where the person had a UCT
qualification, giving the person’s UCT qualification(s),
date(s) obtained and any
awards the student won (e.g., class medals, dean’s merit lists, scholarships
or prizes). This would replace the register that was
last published in 1980;
·
where the person was an
alumnus but did not obtain a qualification from UCT, will list years of
registration and a descriptor (e.g., SSA student, or the qualification for which
registered)
d) by clicking on a current student’s name, you would be
directed to
·
a report as in (a) if a student had already obtained a UCT
qualification; AND
·
a password-protected report giving a students’ full results for the
current and previous years.
This register must not
disclose the following information of a student:
·
address or other contact details;
·
fee history;
·
age;
·
sex; or conduct record;
·
or whether a student was in residence, nor, if so, which
residence(s).
Every report must contain background text making clear that
the report does not constitute
formal certification of these results, and that
·
formal verification
of qualifications may be obtained from the
Student Records Office;
·
formal certification (in the form of a transcript or
duplicate degree, diploma, certificate document) will be provided to, or at the
request of the subject, and only to a student upon request, by the Student Records Office.
e) Publication of Course results and password access to results
·
As a matter of policy,
access to an
individual’s full results (i.e. course
results of past and present students) will be password protected.
·
There should be no
limitation on the University’s practice of and right
to publish the names of students who excel: Dean’s Merit Lists, Lists of
Class medallists, lists of qualifiers with honours/distinction/cum (or magna cum)
laude, will continue to be in the public domain.
·
Each department shall
publish the results of tests and
examinations on publicly accessible departmental
noticeboards and the
class VULA or equivalent site. These would be available for at least
a month after the date of publication but would be taken down within three months.
·
Each faculty shall publish the lists of
qualifiers once
decisions have been made.
·
Password-protected
read-only access to student results would be
provided:
(i)
to academic staff;
(ii)
to wardens and student advisers; and
(iii)
to PASS staff on a
need-to-know basis.
·
A current student would be able to access full results using the network
password, unless these were blocked because of a fee debt.
·
The onus will be on a
current student to provide parents, fee payer(s) and/or bursary agency/sponsor with
results.
·
UCT will not allow access to results on request
by third parties, other than where the
student personally requests this, whether the
requester is a bursary agency, a parent or a fee payer.
·
Full results would
continue to be provided to Council. (One copy of the full
printed set of results for the previous year is tabled at the first meeting of
Council each year, is bound with the formal record of
that Council meeting and is available for public
inspection.)
·
UCT would continue to
provide progress reports to bursary agencies where a student requested this.
·
UCT would continue to
fulfil its obligations to provide full results of each
student to the DHET (Department of Higher Education & Training), recognizing that these
results will be placed on the NLRD (National Learners’ Records Database), and will continue to make acceptance
of this a condition of registration.
·
UCT would revise its PAIA (Promotion of Access to Information) policy, removing public
access to results.
(Senate 27/06/1989, PC04/92, PC09/2008)
The following principles govern the scheduling of the academic year, and the construction of an
academic timetable.
10.1.1 There are to be at least sixty teaching days in every term, followed by a period of consolidation (five
calendar days) and examination (between eleven to fifteen weekdays). Examinations will be scheduled from Monday to Friday (Senate April 2013). (See 10.1
Length and pattern of the academic year.)
10.1.2 The academic year begins as determined by Senate and the first teaching day is
on a Monday.
10.1.3 University holidays and public holidays falling during term do not count as teaching days. No recognition is given to religious
holidays that are
not also University holidays
or public holidays. Senate has decided that three periods
(Jewish New Year covering two days, the Day of Atonement and Eid) are to be listed in the University Calendar so that Heads of Departments may make appropriate arrangements should they so
desire (Senate 12/09/1967).
10.1.4 Senate has decided (April 2013) to schedule examinations on Monday to Friday during
the June
and
October/November examination periods in order to relieve the clustering of undergraduate examinations. There will be three sessions from Monday to Thursday and two sessions on a
Friday.
10.1.5 Deans
may allow international semester study abroad students to write supplementary or deferred examinations at their home institutions. This
provision must
be read in conjunction with General Rule G20.10.
The Examinations Office Manager drafts the examination timetable following guidelines as laid out below.
10.2.1 The
first consideration must be that any student must be able to take his or her examinations in the official period,
as determined by Senate,
for those examinations. The exception to
this is where there is a reason, independent
of the timetable,
for the exam being scheduled in a differen period (e.g. the student was
awarded a deferred exam, supplementary exam or exam without attendance (EWA)).
A student may be required to write up to two examinations in one calendar day, and up to three examinations in a 24-hour period. These examinations may be in consecutive sessions. A student should not be required to write three examinations on one calendar day.
10.2.2 The second consideration must be that the examinations in May/June and in October/November must be scheduled within the periods set by the Senate. No undergraduate examination may be scheduled on a consolidation day. (PC09/2008)
Three examination sessions will be scheduled for each day for Monday through Thursday. Two examination sessions will be scheduled on a Friday. Four-hour examinations must be scheduled to allow adequate time for set up the venue for the start of the next session.
10.2.3 The third consideration must be that clashes should be avoided by using the approved software package and data about student enrolment from the student records system. This provision does not apply to examinations without attendance (EWA).
Where a clash occurs as a result of a student registering late (that is, after the
publication of the provisional or final examination timetable), the department which allowed the student to register late
will be responsible for
making
suitable arrangements to accommodate the student.
Those departments which allow a candidate to take two sequential courses in the same
year/semester must take responsibility for any consequential examination timetable clash:
i.e. such a department will have to set a second paper for the examination session.
In order that no candidate is ever required to write three examinations on one day, and so
that no candidate
(other than an EWA candidate)
is ever required to take his
or her ordinary examinations at the time for deferred examinations,
any unavoidable “triple clash” (a timetable clash involving a single candidate having
three examinations on the same day) must be resolved by
requiring the department concerned to set a different
paper in one of the courses concerned for the candidate(s), to be written during that
examination
session on a suitable day. (PC06/1991)
10.2.4 The fourth consideration must be that
·
Examinations
with multiple choice questions in courses with large enrolments must be scheduled late in the diet;
·
During
the November examinations, all courses with more than 300 enrolments in the Faculty of Humanities should be scheduled during the first week of examinations to allow re-evaluation or
re-examination to take place before the due date for
submission of results.
(PC12/2009)
Students wishing to take two courses lectured in the same lecture period may do so only after obtaining written permission from the Dean, countersigned by one of the Heads of Departments concerned indicating his or her willingness to set
a further question paper.
Except in the case of the Graduate School of Business (GSB), undergraduate faculty or departmental timetables must follow
the main timetable and examination periods.
The GSB sets its own examination periods.
When approval of a new course is sought from a Faculty Board, the lecturing periods and the examination arrangements (e.g.
number of papers) must also
be considered.
Where more time is needed for marking, or to allow for the scheduling of a re-examination of
selected students before the uploading of the results, the department must ask the Examinations Officer to schedule the examination concerned as early
as
possible in the period. The department’s request will be
considered with all similar requests, and accommodated where possible.
(PC08/1990)
Practical performance-based examination timetables are set by the examining
department as follows:
·
Music examination timetables are set by the South
African College of Music.
·
Theatre and drama examination timetables are set by the Centre
for Theatre, Dance and Performance Studies.
·
Dance examination timetables are set by the Centre
for Theatre, Dance and Performance Studies.
(PC11/1989)
All deferred and supplementary examinations must be scheduled so that they can be marked and externally examined by the date set in the
calendar for the uploading of results.
(PC11/1989, PC06/1991)
Timetables are to be published as
follows:
June examinations
2nd week in March First
provisional timetable published
1st week in April Second
provisional timetable published
1st week in May Final timetable published
October/November examinations
2nd week in August First provisional timetable published
Last week in August Second provisional timetable published
3rd week in September Final timetable published
Supplementary/deferred examinations
In the second week following the release of final results |
|
Provisional timetable published |
Five working days after the provisional timetable is published |
|
Final timetable published |
The Examinations
Officer is authorised to change the dates of postgraduate course examinations on the final timetable on the
recommendation of the Head of
Department.
Changes to the final timetable affecting undergraduate courses may be made only by the Examinations
Officer, after consultation
with the Chair of the Senate Teaching and Timetable
Sub-Committee, the
Head of Department and with the support of all students concerned. A change can only be made if it does
not cause any further clashes.
The Examinations
Office shall report any such change to the
Faculty Manager(s) concerned.
10.11.1 Except by the permission of the Senate all examinations must be written at the University. Senate has authorised faculties to schedule examinations outside of Cape Town in the case
of:
(i)
distance-mode courses;
(ii)
block-release mode courses where a significant proportion of a
class is ordinarily resident elsewhere; and
(iii)
blended-mode courses.
10.11.2 Examinations
for students taking distance or block release offerings may be written at locations off campus. In all locations examinations are to be conducted under the conditions specified by Senate to ensure their integrity.
(PC09/2014)
10.11.3 The
venue capacity used for teaching should not be used for the above examinations/class
tests. The following should act as a guide for venue
seating arrangements during class test and exams:
·
A flat-floor venue – reduce the venue capacity used
for teaching by half to allow
sufficient space between students as well as
sufficient walking space for the invigilator between the desks.
·
A raked/semi raked venue – a student to sit at every
second desk using all rows and in cases in which the walking space between the
rows is not sufficient, every second row will be kept open to allow the
invigilator easier access to the students. This also
allows the student easy access to leave the venue without disturbing any other
student.
(PC05/1991)
For undergraduate courses, June examinations or class tests counting towards the coursework mark may
be scheduled as part of the June Examination period timetable for year courses (H or W suffixes). A department which wants to schedule such a
June
examination during this period
arranges with the Examinations Officer for
it to be included in the timetable.
No class test assessment, other than those class tests which are included in the official timetable, may be held
in the June examination period.
No class
test or other form of assessment may be held
in the days set
aside for consolidation.
UNIVERSITY
OF CAPE TOWN
INSTRUCTIONS TO PRINCIPAL
INVIGILATORS
(Senate Revision September
1991, E&AC edited 2009)
THE
INSTRUCTIONS BELOW MUST BE FOLLOWED
STRICTLY
1. PROCEDURE BEFORE THE EXAMINATIONS BEGIN
1.1 The Principal invigilator must be
present 30 minutes before
the published start time of the examination to take delivery of scripts,
except for the Sport Centres, Sarah
Baartman and New Lecture Theatre, where the Principal
invigilator must be present one
hour before the published
time of the exam.
All
assistant invigilators must be
present between 20 and 40 minutes before
the published start time of the
examination (the time to be advised by
the Examinations Office depending on circumstances). The Principal invigilator should use 10-15 min to hold a caucus meeting with all assistant invigilators before the students enters the venue. The Principal
invigilator should ensure that all assistant invigilators are familiar with these
instructions, briefed on procedure
and the roles of
the assistant invigilators in that specific session (e.g. where there are multiple papers being written,
how the papers
will be handed out and collected). The Principal should ensure that all invigilators know what is expected
of them before the session starts.
1.2
The candidates are permitted to enter 15
minutes before an examination is due to
begin.
1.3
The Principal invigilator must ensure (1) that attendance slips,
and the required number of printed answer books have been laid on tables; (2) that entrance cards are shuffled and ready and (3) that tables are numbered
as required
before students enter.
1.4
The Principal invigilator must ensure that an area INSIDE the examination venue is used for candidates to
place unauthorised material, it being understood
that the University accepts no responsibility for the safe keeping of such items.
1.5
The remaining invigilators must
see that brief-cases, handbags, cell phones, books, notes or any
other
materials not authorised by the Principal invigilator are placed in the designated
area and that each
candidate sits at the table allotted to him or
her, unless the Principal
invigilator considers that there is good
reason for moving
the candidate.
No student may have a cell phone on his / her person,
or
desk.
1.6 In the unlikely event that
the venue cannot
accommodate all the students who have presented themselves for the examination,
the Principal invigilator should consult the building supervisor
or phone the Examinations Office. Arrangements will be made for the students to be taken to another venue. Principal invigilators should not ask
the building supervisors
to provide extra desks and
chairs.
2. PROCEDURE AT THE
START OF THE EXAMINATION
2.1 Examinations must start promptly at the published time. The following announcements must
be made by the Principal invigilator:
1.
ANY
BOOKS, NOTES, BAGS OR OTHER MATERIAL NOT AUTHORISED FOR USE IN
THIS EXAMINATION MUST
BE PLACED UNDER YOUR DESK.
2.
NO STUDENT
IN THIS VENUE SHALL HAVE ON THEIR PERSON OR DESK ANY DEVICE CAPABLE OF THE
STORAGE, RETRIEVAL, TRANSMISSION, OR RECEPTION OF DATA INCLUDING (BUT NOT
LIMITED TO) CELLPHONES, SMARTPHONES, CALCULATORS, TABLETS, LAPTOPS, MP3
PLAYERS, IPODS, AND WATCHES.
3.
EXCEPTIONS MAY BE GRANTED BY COURSE
CONVENORS (E.G. NON-PROGRAMMABLE CALCULATORS).
4.
A DEVICE
SPECIFIED IN (2) THAT IS BROUGHT INTO AN EXAMINATION VENUE MUST BE PLACED IN A
BAG THAT IS NOT ON THE STUDENT’S DESK AND MUST BE SWITCHED OFF.
5.
UCT
RESERVES THE RIGHT TO USE METAL DETECTORS AND ELECTRONIC SCANNERS (E.G.
CELLPHONE DETECTORS) TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY OF ITS EXAMINATION PROCESSES.
6.
IF THERE ARE ANY STUDENTS
PRESENT WITH EXTRA TIME CONCESSIONS, THEY ARE TO WRITE IN THE EXTRA TIME VENUE
(AS COMMUNICATED IN YOUR LETTER). THEY SHOULD PLEASE MAKE THEIR
WAY THERE IMMEDIATELY
AS EXTRA TIME
CANNOT BE ACCOMMODATED IN
THE MAIN VENUE.
7.
YOU
MAY NOT LEAVE DURING THE FIRST SIXTY OR THE LAST TWENTY MINUTES OF THE EXAMINATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL
NOT BE ALLOWED TO LEAVE
THE VENUE TO GO TO THE TOILET WITHIN THE FIRST
HOUR
OF THE EXAMINATION.
8.
LEAVE QUESTION PAPERS FACE DOWNWARDS UNTIL PERMISSION IS GIVEN FOR
THE EXAMINATION TO BEGIN.
9.
PLEASE FILL IN
THE
ATTENDANCE SLIP ON YOUR TABLE.
LEAVE YOUR UCT REGISTRATION CARD AND ENTRANCE CARD NEXT TO
IT.
10.
PLEASE NOW READ THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE ATTENDANCE SLIP.
2.2 Hand out question papers face downwards only after the students have entered and settled. Where multiple papers are written, call upon
candidates in each course concerned to stand, and use all the available invigilators and departmental representatives to hand out the
same paper at the same time. When it has been established that
every candidate has a copy of the correct paper, announce the starting time
and duration of each examination.
2.3 Where applicable, give instructions on the use
of answer books according to the specific requirements of each examination.
2.4 Where a department has not been requested to supply an invigilator,
a departmental representative should be available for as long as necessary then leave a contact phone
number and be on call to answer any queries. If no representative is present and
queries cannot be resolved, please contact the Examinations Officer at Ext
3692/4.
2.5 Each entrance to the venue should be monitored to receive latecomers and direct
them to their tables after the distribution of papers. No latecomers
may be admitted to the venue after an hour has elapsed. No extra time may be given to latecomers.
3. PROCEDURE DURING
THE EXAMINATION
3.1 Collect any unused answer books and attendance slips from unoccupied desks.
3.2 After the first ten minutes collect all attendance slips and at the same time check that each candidate is in possession of a
current registration card. Check the attendance slip against card and face.
Any candidate without a current registration card who cannot be verified by any of the invigilators or by a departmental representative should be given a pink form to complete (i.e. in the student’s own handwriting). The bottom half of the form must be retained by
the candidate for presentation to the relevant department, and the top half sent to the department responsible for the examination. These slips must be retained in the department, who should check the handwriting of the student presenting the ID card. This must match the writing on the pink
slip.
3.3 Students are allocated a seat number by the
Examinations Office. Unless there is good reason,
insist that numbers match to the one on the class list/seating plan. Do a headcount. Move students if necessary.
3.4 Issue further answer books as required by candidates.
3.5 Invigilators must be active in their invigilation and check frequently by walking around the hall.
Look out for irregularities e.g. unauthorised answer books, or other materials/notes at a
candidate’s feet, attempts to communicate, etc. Students may be required to remove or reverse peak caps as the wearing of a peak cap makes it difficult
for the invigilator to see where the wearer is looking.
If any irregularity is discovered or
suspected, the work already attempted by the candidate must
be collected immediately, together with any evidence. The candidate may continue in a fresh
answer book. No extra time may be granted. The Principal invigilator must send a written report, together with all relevant evidence on the incident, to the
Legal Services and Secretariat Department as
soon as the examination session
has ended.
3.6 From the collected attendance slips, check the attendance lists. The names of those present should be ticked off, and absentees
clearly designated. The Principal invigilator should add the name of any candidate
not on the attendance list and initial the addition.
3.7 A student is not allowed to leave an examination venue and return to continue writing. Allowance is made to enable students to use the toilets and for Muslim students to perform their daily prayers as follows:
A student who requests to use the toilet must be escorted by an invigilator. Students may not leave the
venue during the first hour. Not more than one student is allowed to leave the venue at a time. The invigilator who
escorts
the student to the toilet should indicate which toilet
stall should be used,
and check that the stall is clear of hidden notes etc. A register (provided) of all students who leave and re-enter the venue must be kept
for
each course written. Note the student’s name,
number, the name of the accompanying invigilator, the stall used and the time. The register for the relevant course must be handed
to the department representative together with the
scripts at the end
of the session.
For Muslim students daily prayers may be performed silently and individually,
thus not causing any disturbance at all. Students will be monitored by an invigilator for the
duration of the prayer and are not granted any extra time.
3.8 Give a time warning at 30 minutes before the end to announce that
candidates may not leave the venue in the last 20 minutes of the examination. Announce the start of the last 20 minutes, after which
nobody may leave. This rule must be strictly enforced.
3.9 Give a time warning at 5 minutes before the end of the session.
4. PROCEDURE AT THE
END OF EXAMINATIONS
4.1 At the end of the examination, candidates must be told:
PLEASE
STOP
WRITING
AND CLOSE YOUR BOOKS. REMAIN
SEATED.
Invigilators must see that this instruction is carried out
promptly.
4.2 Ask candidates to check that they have correctly
completed the covers of their answer books.
Students MUST fill
in their student number/EMPL ID in the space provided on the cover of the answer
book.
Invigilators should not accept scripts that do not have the EMPL
ID filled in. The total number of books submitted must be indicated on the cover.
4.3 Scripts must be collected by invigilators before the students are given permission to leave the venue.
This task should not be delegated to anyone who is not an invigilator. Where a
student hands in more than one book, ensure that the
number of books tally with
the number indicated
on the cover of the first book.
4.4 Either of the two methods of collecting scripts described below is acceptable:
(a) Each row is allotted to an invigilator who collects the scripts as he/she walks down the row, not
passing any student without collecting his/her script/s. If more than one paper is being written in
the same venue, the papers are sorted
out after the students have left.
(b) Scripts for each paper are collected separately in turn, students indicating the papers they have written by raising their hands as the name of the paper is read out. Invigilators go up and down the
rows, not passing any students with raised hands without
collecting their scripts.
It is not acceptable to
collect books at
the door.
4.5 Announce:
ANYONE WHOSE SCRIPT HAS NOT BEEN COLLECTED PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND and
see
that the books are collected. Remind candidates that they may not remove answer books from the venue.
4.6 The total number of answer books (or sets of) must be checked and reconciled with
the attendance list totals.
4.7 At the end of the examination, departmental representatives will
return to the examination venue to collect and sign for the answer books for their examination. The register of those who left the venue must accompany the
scripts and be given to the departmental representative. Any uncollected answer books
will be collected by the Properties and Services staff on duty in the venue.
4.8 The Principal invigilator must complete the session report via a Google Docs form for the entire venue and not only the course they are assigned
to. Irregularities must be reported to Legal Services and
Secretariat (see 3.5) and illness to the Deferred Examinations Officer (see 5.3).
4.9 Attendance lists of
invigilators and students, attendance slips, session
reports, and any
other communication for the Examinations Office must be put into an envelope and details of
the course code, date and venue must be completed on the outside. Please forward
the envelope(s) directly to the Examinations Office immediately after each exam, (Room 5.07,
Level 5, Masingene Building, Middle Campus) via internal mail.
4.10 Along with the delivery of the papers to the exam venue, an empty box clearly marked
with the course code, venue, date and time of the exam is delivered to the venue (supplied by departmental staff).
This box must be marked "scrap".
·
At the end of the exam, after
all answer books have been collected, the invigilators are required to gather up ALL remaining answer books and
any other paper or materials from the desks in the venue and place these in the box. The Principal invigilator signs a declaration on the box confirming that ALL materials
issued to students have been gathered from the desks, and that
there is no remaining material in the examination venue.
·
This box is then taken by the
invigilator to the course administrator's office where it is stored
until the end of the window period for students to view exam scripts. The box
is opened only where there is a query and there appears to be a missing answer
book.
5. CASES OF ILLNESS
5.1 A candidate who has to leave the
examination venue for medical reasons will be escorted to the Paramedic stationed outside by an invigilator. The
Paramedic will make an assessment and refer the student to Student Wellness or to return to the venue to complete the exam.If this facility is closed, the
student must be advised to visit his/her family doctor.
5.2 The student must also be advised to visit the Student Records Office within seven days of the examinations. See rules governing deferred examinations in General Rules and Policies, Handbook 3, rules G27-28.
5.3 A written report from the Principal invigilator must be submitted to the Deferred Examinations Administrator, Student Records Office, Level 4,
Masingene Building, Middle Campus, stating the name of the student, student number,
course code and date of the examination paper, as well as the circumstances under which the student left without completing
the examination.
6. EMERGENCY
CONTACT NUMBERS
6.1 In the event of a bomb scare or other emergency,contact
Campus Control, Ext. 2222 and act on their instructions.
6.2 Other queries should be addressed to the Examinations
Office, Ext. 3694 or 3692.
[Reviewed by Examinations
and Assessment
Committee, 26 August 2015]
Guideline agenda for invigilators’
caucus about 20
minutes before students enter examination room
The purpose of this meeting
is for the Principal invigilator to inform the team of invigilators of:
·
The procedures and rules generally,
and
·
The arrangements to execute them in the session concerned
Take register of invigilators in attendance through mutual introductions to
enable cooperation.
2.
Explain rules regarding students’ right to leave (not before an
hour; not in last twenty minutes) and explain toilet arrangements (see 11 below).
3.
Delegate invigilator/s to handle entrance card distribution at door.
4.
Explain procedure to be followed for distribution of question papers (depends on number of courses being examined in the venue), and explicitly require all
invigilators (but not departmental reps not invigilating)
to participate (other than person at entrance door) and to place the papers
face down.
5.
If more than one examination is being written in a venue, finalise arrangements for that.
6.
Explain procedure to be followed once examination has begun:
6.1 Gather answer books and attendance slips from unoccupied places
6.2 Systematically collect attendance slips (row by row to avoid later problems with
reconciling slip numbers with headcount numbers) – the Examinations Office will allocate individuals particular rows per
course in alphabetical order which should make it easier to reconcile with row
headcounts.
6.3 Check that all students have student ID cards and require that ID photos are compared with
face of person writing when entrance cards and attendance slips are collected – provide pink forms to those
without IDs, and wait to collect top section. (This will go to the
department).
6.4 Allocate individual invigilators rows other than those whence they collected
slips to undertake headcount (or else Principal to do headcount, recorded by row).
7.
Remind all invigilators of the requirement to move around the room and to be vigilant
throughout examination (no reading; chatting; tea to be taken
serially).
8.
Explain fully the rules and processes to be followed re evidence of
irregularities during examination (3.5 in “Instructions to Principal Invigilators”) and insist on those rules
and processes being followed to the letter.
9.
Appoint one man and one woman to be responsible (after a full hour only – no toilet absences before that) for completing a toilet
register and require those two invigilators consistently to ensure that no more than one student of either gender is in the toilet at any one
time. Those two need to be advised
specifically about rules as per 3.7 in “Instructions to Principal Invigilators”. If more than one course is
being examined, a register needs to be kept
for each course as the register(s) must be returned to the department.
10. Explain procedure for reconciling
headcounts with attendance slips and for using attendance slips to mark attendance register; and specify who will be responsible for those tasks. Emphasise that during that
time, others must be additionally
vigilant.
11. Explain procedure to be followed
at the end of the examination:
11.1 Note that completed answer books should be gathered systematically row
by row and allocate invigilators particular rows for collection. The same
procedure should apply even when more than one course is being examined (and again exclude departmental reps not
invigilating).
11.2 Require
invigilators to ensure that students have numbered each answer book used and
indicated precisely how many have been used; also, to check that each student submits same number of books as recorded – to
avoid claims later that an answer was in ‘the other book’.
11.3 Require
invigilators to collect unused answer books and ensure students do not leave the venue with them.
11.4 Once
students have left the venue: count all scripts and ensure that their total tallies with the total of
students recorded as having sat the examination.
11.5 If
necessary, divide scripts into different examinations that have been written.
12. Discuss any other issues that are
anticipated might arise – including how to handle answer books from students who leave the venue early (in the period after an hour but before the final twenty minutes).
13. Stress that all invigilators are accountable to the Principal invigilator for their conduct during the
session, and that Principal invigilators, who are accountable to their
respective Head of Department, are also required to report invigilator misconduct (or non-attendance) of
invigilators from other Departments to their respective Heads of Department.
UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN
A GUIDE FOR EXAMINERS
This memorandum is a guide
for internal and external examiners, and for heads of
departments. It sets out our approach to examinations and assessment, and details the different roles of
the internal examiner, the external examiner, the Head of Department (HoD) and the Faculty Examinations Committee (FEC) in the examination process.
INTRODUCTION
1. Most
results are a combination of in-course assessment and marks obtained in one or more written papers at
the end
of the course. We publish results
as percentages and
classify them
as
follows:
75 - 100% First
Class
70 – 74% Second Class
(Division one)
60 – 69% Second Class
(Division two)
50 – 59% Third Class
Under 50% Fail
We ask Examiners to use the full range of marks (0 to 100) and avoid the tendency to give a mark of 75% to really
first class work (which might merit a mark in the 90s) or a mark in the 40s to a
candidate whose work deserves less.
Where a percentage result is not obtained, a student’s status may be reflected as:
Pass results symbols
PA Pass
UP Unclassified Pass (a condoned pass or a supplementary examination written on academic grounds is graded as an Unclassified Pass)
SP Pass result obtained via a supplementary examination
Fail results symbols
F Fail
FS Failed, but permitted to
write a supplementary examination on academic grounds
SF Supplementary examination failed
ASF Failed,
absent from supplementary examination
UF SM Unclassified
fail, sub minimum not met
OSS Sub
minima failed, supplementary examination awarded
Other results symbols
DPR Duly
performed certificate refused (not permitted to write the examination)
AB Absent from the course or examination
DE Permitted to write a deferred examination in this course on medical, religious,
political or other good cause
OS Result
not yet available
GIP Course
still in progress, result expected in a subsequent term
LOA Leave
of absence
ATT Course
attended
INC Incomplete: course not
completed
EXA Excluded from assessment
NOTE: DPR, AB and INC
are fail results.
2. The rule of combination of marks for each component of the
assessment is determined in advance for each course, and
published to students in the handbook and course outline.
3. Internal and external examiners have responsibilities for all parts of the examination.
4. Internal and external examiners must try to ensure fairness.
5. Internal and external examiners must avoid conflicts of interest, and should not
accept appointment where a conflict will arise.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS.
6. The Head of Department is responsible for the integrity and standard of each course his or her department offers, and must exercise this responsibility in the context of the programme(s) the course serves.
7. In regard to examinations, the Head
of Department must
(a)
ensure that the examination is fair;
(b)
appoint the internal
examiner and
ensure he/she
carries out his/her role (the
internal
examiner will usually be the course convenor);
(c)
after consultation with the internal examiner, make a recommendation to the Faculty Board for the appointment of the external examiner
for the course and ensure he/she carries out
his/her role;
(d)
ensure that all
examinations are scheduled in the university timetable;
(e)
ensure that all the Department’s results are valid, that all mark sheets have been completed, independently checked and signed-off by
the head , the internal examiner, and the external examiner before submission via the Student
Records Office, to the Faculty Examinations Committee (FEC);
(f)
convene a departmental meeting, prior to the FEC meeting, to consider borderline cases and where applicable proposals for supplementary examinations; and
(g)
present the recommendations of the Examiners to the FEC, with such information as may be needed (e.g. class records).
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE INTERNAL EXAMINER
8 The internal examiner is responsible for designing the overall assessment of the course, for setting the draft question paper(s), and providing a marking guide (and where applicable, sample solutions).
The plan must include any sub-minima for sections of the course. The overall assessment
must relate to the course objectives. The internal examiner is responsible for
ensuring that all the work of each candidate is examined, for the validity,
accuracy and completeness of the marking and addition of marks, as well as the validity,
accuracy and completeness of the in-course assessment record.
9. The internal examiner must:
(a)
give to the external examiner the course outline and objectives, details of the way the course is taught and is to be
assessed, and the draft question paper(s) (and, where applicable, the
sample solutions) and marking guide in good time;
(b)
finalise
the examination paper, taking account of
the views of the external examiner, checking and certifying the final copy for reproduction;
(c)
plan
the marking of the scripts;
(d)
be
at the examination(s) for at least the first 30 minutes and deal with any questions that
arise;
(e)
collect the scripts from the Principal invigilator at the end of examination(s), check them and sign for them;
(f)
secure the scripts, and organise marking without delay;
(g)
send the marked scripts, copies of the mark sheets, examination question paper(s) (and sample solutions
where appropriate) to the external examiner, specifically referring the external examiner to
each
borderline case, and any unusual or special features;
(h)
agree the recommended examination result, and recommended overall course result,
with the external examiner; enter the overall course result for each student; and submit the recommended final results signed by internal and external examiners, to the Head of Department; and where there is no agreement, report the differences.
THE ROLE OF THE EXTERNAL
EXAMINER
10 The external examiner is part of our quality assurance process. He or she
is asked to ensure that the overall assessment is appropriate to the course objectives; that it
tests the students; and that
the question paper(s) meet(s) the outcomes. He or
she must also ensure marking integrity,and that
the examination is fair and has been fairly conducted
11. To do this, the external examiner must:
(a)
ensure that the question paper(s) is/are fair, representative and an adequate test of the course; and
that the overall design of the assessment for the course fair; doing so he or she must
consider:
·
the
length of the paper(s)/assignment(s)
·
the
clarity of the questions:
are
they unambiguous?
·
the
balance of the paper(s)
(b)
return the draft question paper(s), marking guide and sample answers, with comments and recommendations,
to the internal examiner in good time, in a secure way (e.g. by signature- on-delivery post, in person,
or by courier);
(c)
mark the scripts (or a valid sample agreed with the internal examiner, including the top and the bottom students and borderline cases, the sample being large enough
to give confidence in the process) (see 16 below);
(d)
having given special attention to all borderline
and special cases and having been given the results of in-course assessment, make recommendations
for the results for the examination, and the
course; discuss these with the internal examiner in order to reach consensus
(if possible); to report to the Head of
Department any serious divergence
between the marks awarded by the internal and external Examiners;
(e)
sign off the recommended results, return all scripts, and
submit his/her claim for expenses
to the Head of Department;
(f)
complete his/her
report on the examination and the course and submit this to the Head of
Department.
ORAL
EXAMINATIONS, FURTHER TESTING, SUPPLEMENTARY AND DEFERRED EXAMINATIONS
12 The Examiners may:
(a)
give any candidate an
oral
examination; or
(b)
give any candidate a further written test
in order to reach a recommendation. This
will usually only be necessary in borderline cases. In the Humanities faculty, students whose final mark falls between 46% and 49%
might be re-examined prior to the examination scripts being considered by the external examiner. This option should only be available to students who have completed all the required coursework. The form of the re-examination
is determined by the departments.
13 Supplementary examinations are offered by the FEC only, and only where faculty rules allow this. They are offered to students who have failed, but who, in the view of the FEC,
need to do more work before presenting themselves for fresh examination but do not need to repeat the course before
doing so. The form of supplementary examination is at the discretion of the department, and may
be tailored to test the weaknesses of a student.
14 Deferred examinations are examinations deferred to a later date because the student had good grounds (usually medical grounds) for not presenting himself
or herself for examination on the set date(s). They are awarded by a special committee of Senate.
THE ROLE OF THE FACULTY EXAMINATIONS COMMITTEE (FEC)
15 The FEC meets to consider the recommendations of the Examiners. It acts for Senate. It receives
proposals from departments and programme committees. It must:
(a)
finalise
results;
(b)
in
doing so, look at each student’s performance across courses (and may
grant condoned passes);
(c)
decided whether or not to allow
students who have not yet met published readmission requirements to return to the University, and decided each student’s promotion
status (whether a student qualifies,
may
continue, may not
continue, etc);
(d)
decide whether to award supplementary examinations, and
(e)
decide who qualifies for degrees, diplomas or certificates.
MARKING A SAMPLE
16 There is no fixed
rule for this, but rather a general understanding that
the external examiner should mark and scrutinise not fewer than 1 in 8 (in a class
of up to 100); not fewer than 1 in 15 (in a class of up 500); and not fewer than
1 in 25 (in a class of more than 500). The scrutiny should include a check that
each question has been marked, that marks have been added up
correctly, and that mark allocation has been consistent and fair. If an error is detected, the external examiner should insist
on the rechecking of all scripts.
EXAMINATION WITHOUT ATTENDANCE GUIDELINES
Rule GB 10
A student who fails a course (in a bachelor’s degree) must re-attend the course before he or she is again
admitted to the examination: provided that Senate may permit a student to take the examination without re-attendance, under special circumstances and on
the
recommendation of the Head
of Department concerned, on
condition there is no
clash on
the
examination timetables.
The
record must show the student failed the course, and
repeated
it
as an EWA. How the result is determined
may
vary – see G16.2.
An EWA requires
support from the HoD (inter alia to ensure that the course has not changed since the
student took it previously).
An EWA should not be widely used, or used
as an alternative to repeating the course in the ordinary way, but
it
may be appropriate in a
limited number of special circumstances. The course must have been
failed previously (item c below is the exception where ‘failed’ refers to failing to attain the required 60% threshold).
Rule GB10
applies to courses in a bachelor’s degree.
The special circumstances could include,
but
are not limited
to:
(a)
The sole remaining course (previously failed) needed to graduate. This may be to avoid financial hardship resulting from returning (including staying in residence) and not being employed for an additional year (in the case of an international student the cost of repeating a sole remaining course is particularly high as the international levy applies - regardless of the load taken). Where a (local or international) student has obtained work and the department believes that there is a reasonable chance
of passing without re-attending, this could be an option, particularly
in courses where no supplementary examination is offered.
(b)
Where a department offers neither re-examination (i.e. before the uploading of the results) nor a
supplementary examination,
and there is evidence from the coursework that the student did well in the course but
'crashed'
in
the examination, an EWA could be considered to allow
the
student to complete a pre-
requisite course by EWA
in
January, and thus not unduly delay continuing (better time to
graduation). Similarly, it could be offered to those genuine cases where a student misreads the timetable and is
thus
given a result of AB (no deferred examination
is
allowed in such a case). Such an AB
result may, for example in a core EBE course, mean a strong student is prevented from proceeding to
the
next year level.
Here
the
HOD (or convener) would need to be sure
that it is a strong
student who genuinely misread the timetable.
An AB will be entered for the examination missed, and a
separate enrolment and result for an EWA version will show on the transcript.
(c)
Entrance EWA
In the case of Commerce, students seeking to pass with 60% take an entrance examination without attendance in January for a course passed in
November with a result in the range 50-59%. This is a
pass, but is not sufficient to proceed to
the
next level in the CA stream.
Clearly the EWA must be used only in special circumstances, and the HOD and Dean need to ensure that the
necessary judgment and discretion is used.
RISKS TO BE
CONSIDERED FOR ONLINE EXAMINATIONS:
Before
examinations
·
Inappropriate technology choices / lack of awareness of risks
·
Incorrect setup of
online examinations (e.g.
to reveal answers)
·
Disclosure of examination questions (e.g. an individual’s PC being compromised by spyware / malware / phishing, network security being compromised by password disclosure, or material
being placed in an
insecure online location)
During
examinations
·
Access to supporting content (e.g. on Vula, on the PC, on
the
Internet)
·
Communication
with others (e.g.
Chat,
SMS, IM) from PC or mobile phone
·
Leaking examination password (allowing examination to be taken online outside the examination venue)
·
Recording the examination questions for subsequent “underground” circulation (cut & paste to
desktop
/ flash drive / online location)
Security factors to consider for online examinations
·
Designing the examination appropriately to minimise scope for cheating. Randomized questions and answers (each student has a different set of questions,
answers presented in a random order).
·
Password restrictions for each
examination (what you know).
·
IP-based restrictions for each
examination (where you are).
·
Restrictions on the Windows desktop and browser in the lab during the test (e.g. no ability to run
other programs).
·
Restrictions on the network configuration for the lab during the test (e.g. no external Internet
access).
·
Time pressure.
·
Analysis of results.
·
Detailed activity log on Vula (later doing a forensic auditing if required).
Guidelines for the submission of
electronic examinations
The setup and configuration of online and electronic examinations must be done
in consultation with CET,
ICTS or faculty IT staff in
advance. Extra-time candidates should be accommodated in the same venue(s) as the other candidates taking the examination.
Online examinations should preferably take place during office hours but where
required after hours, a
technician
must
be present to assist with any technical queries and/or problems that are reported.
1.
NO submissions: The examiner has to ensure that there are mechanisms in place so that candidates
can check whether their submissions have gone through before they leave the venue. With such a mechanism in place, it is thus each candidate’s responsibility to check that his/her submission has
indeed gone through before he/she leaves the exam venue. At the end of the examination, when the
exam venue has been cleared of all the candidates, no
more submissions will be permissible and any
candidate who has not made a submission
will be awarded a mark of zero for that exam.
2.
EMPTY submissions: The convener must create sufficient opportunities for candidates to practice during
class to address
this
concern. It is the responsibility of each candidate to complete any such
practice submission(s).
The understanding
is
that successful completion of the practice submission(s)
will in turn lead to successful completion of the actual examination submission, provided that the same steps are followed. Failure to complete the practice submission(s) may lead to insufficient
submission skills. Among other things, this may
result in empty submissions,
in which a
submitted folder contains no files. Any candidate with an empty
submission will be awarded a mark of zero for
that submission.
3.
WRONG submissions: It is the candidate’s responsibility to ensure that his/her submitted files are the correct ones. This especially applies to open book exams in which candidates are allowed access to
his/her Network drives during the exam. Any candidate who submitted the wrong file will be awarded
a mark of zero for that submission.
4.
INCOMPLETE submission: Computer difficulties during the exam must be reported immediately to
the
Principal invigilator, and handled at his or her discretion and resolved in a manner
that does not prejudice the student.
5.
Using file names other than those specified in the examination instructions may lead to a loss of marks. Similarly, submitting
the
examination in a way other than that specified may lead to a loss of
marks. Such cases will be dealt with at the discretion
of the examiner. The examination submission
instructions should specify clearly any penalties that may be applied in any such cases.
PLEASE RETURN COMPLETED COPY TO EXAMS OFFICE WITH EACH PAPER SUBMITTED
FOR PRINTING
COURSE CODE: _____________________________
DURATION OF EXAM
(including reading time, if applicable):
_____________________________
(Please check against the timetable for
discrepancies)
TOTAL PAGES IN
PAPER:
_____________________________
TOTAL MARKS
ALLOCATED IN PAPER: _____________________________
(Please
tick the relevant box
below):
|
YES |
NO |
|
1 |
Have you clearly
indicated the course code on the cover page? |
|
|
2 |
Have you checked
that all pages are attached? |
|
|
3 |
Do the total
marks add up to the total listed above? |
|
|
4 |
Are all sections
clearly indicated? |
|
|
5 |
Are all
instructions clearly indicated? |
|
|
6 |
Can the paper be
sent to the library? |
|
|
7a |
Are there any
formula sheets or additional documents attached to this paper? |
|
|
7b |
Are the students
allowed to bring any additional notes, formula sheets etc into the exam? |
|
|
7c |
Is this an open
book exam? |
|
|
7d |
Are the students
allowed to use a calculator? |
|
|
7e |
Are the graphics
added to this paper clear? No colour copies
or large scale copies are allowed. |
|
|
8 |
If you have
answered yes to any question 7a-e, is it indicated on the cover page? |
|
|
9 |
How many answer
books for each student are required for this paper? Has this been arranged
with the relevant Properties and Services staff as they are required to put
down only one book on the desk? |
|
|
10 |
If there are two
papers for this course, have you ensured that the content and cover page of
the paper match? |
|
|
11 |
Has the external
examiner approved the final version of the paper as presented here? |
|
|
12 |
Can the
examination be written via online proctoring? |
|
|
Course
Convenor Name: _____________________________
Course
Convenor cellphone number _____________________________
Signature:
_____________________________
External
Examiner name _____________________________
External Examiner Signature _____________________________
Date: _____________________________
TOTAL COPIES TO BE
PRINTED: _____________________________
EXAM DATE: _____________________________
FOR EXAM STAFF ONLY FIRST
COUNT QUALITY CHECK DONE BY:
_____________________________ SECOND
COUNT QUALITY CHECK DONE BY: _____________________________ METER
START _____________________________METER END_____________________________ TOTAL
PAGES PRINTED______________________
TOTAL PAPERS PRINTED _________________ ABOVE
COMPLETED BY: ________________________ DATE: __________________________ |
FORMAL OR
CLASS TEST
EXAMINATION PAPER
PRINTING LOG SHEET DATE: |
||||||||||
COURSE
CODE |
NUMBER OF PAGES
P/PAPER |
NUMBER OF PAPERS PRINTED |
MACHINE START
READING |
MACHINE END READING |
TOTAL SPOILS |
SPOILS
CHECKED BY DEPT. ADMIN |
CORRELATION CHECKED BY
DEPT. ADMIN |
DEPT. ADMIN SIGNATURE |
SECOND
PERSON SIGNATURE |
COMMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INSTRUCTIONS TO PRINCIPAL INVIGILATORS FOR ONLINE EXAMINATIONS
1.1 The Principal invigilator must be present
at least 30 minutes before the published start
time of the examination to ensure that all
computers are in working order and
that the pre-loaded examination is working.
1.2 At the start of
the examination candidates
should be told:
DO NOT ENTER THE PASSWORD UNTIL INSTRUCTED.
1.3 If any irregularity is
discovered or suspected, the
work already attempted by the candidate must be
saved immediately, together with any evidence. The student must
submit and
restart the test, to continue where it was interrupted.
1.4 At the end
of the examination, candidates must be told:
SUBMIT YOUR ONLINE EXAM AND REMAIN
SEATED/LEAVE THE VENUE (Principal to announce whichever comment
is applicable).
1.5 Discuss any issues related to online examinations - include specific instructions on how to deal with technical difficulties.
INDEX
A
Absent, 30, 53
Academic, 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 21, 23, 24,
27, 29, 34, 52
Access, 4, 18, 31, 32, 33, 34, 39, 60,
61
Accountability, 3, 25
Accountable, 18, 25, 48
Additional Time, 3, 21
Adequate, 18, 21, 35,
55
Administration, 3, 17
Administrator, 18, 45
Announce, 43, 44
Anonymous, 3, 25
Answer Books, 40, 41, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48
Application, 9, 10, 20
Applied, 13, 14, 26, 62
Appointed, 15, 16, 24
Appointment, 14, 16, 53
Appointment
Of External Examiners, 2, 15
Approval, 3, 27
Approve, 14, 28
Approved, 15, 16, 17, 18, 24, 25, 27,
28, 30, 35
Archives, 20
Arranged, 8, 10
Arrangements, 4, 17, 18, 21, 34, 36, 38, 47
Assess, 6
Assessment, 2, 6, 7, 8, 22, 26,
27, 30, 31, 39, 46, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56
Assignments, 4, 6, 8, 31
Attendance Lists, 43
Attendance Slips, 40, 42, 43, 47, 48
Authenticate, 20
Authorised, 21, 38, 40
Authority, 6, 15, 16, 28
Award, 2, 3, 10, 17, 27, 28, 57
B
Block Release, 14, 38
Breach, 18, 22
C
Calculation,3, 11, 26
Caps, 42
Cards, 20, 40, 47
Centres, 4, 38
Certificates, 3, 9, 17, 27, 28, 29, 57
Certified, 20
Change, 3,17, 28, 29, 38
Cheating, 14, 60
Checklist, 5, 18, 63
Circumstances, 9, 10, 13, 40, 46, 58, 59
Class Tests, 4, 6, 8, 9, 14, 18, 23, 24,
31, 32, 38, 39
Class Work, 2, 6
Classification, 4, 7, 10, 29, 31
Collect, 21, 24, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48, 54
Communication, 18, 45
Compiling, 18, 19
Concessions, 27, 28
Conditions, 13, 14, 17, 25, 38
Confidentiality, 3,16, 17
Consistency, 21, 26
Construction, 4, 9, 34, 35
Contribute, 2, 6, 7, 8, 12, 22, 23
Copy, 17, 18, 19, 20, 32, 34,
41, 54
Course Convener, 21, 25, 26
Courses, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12,
13, 14, 15, 16, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 31, 36, 37, 38, 39, 47, 57, 58
Coursework, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 16, 25, 39,
56, 58
D
Dates, 4, 37
Dean, 16, 17, 26, 28, 29, 33, 36,
50, 59
Declaration, 45
Deferred, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,
13, 14, 15, 23, 28, 30, 35, 36, 37, 38, 46, 53, 56, 59
Deferred, 2, 7, 9, 10, 15, 45, 46, 56
Defined, 6, 7
Definition, 2, 6
Degrees, 3, 9, 27, 28, 29, 57
Deleted, 19
Delivered, 3, 15, 19,
45
Department, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12,
14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 28, 32, 33, 36, 37, 39, 42, 43, 47, 48,
53, 56, 58
Destroyed, 19
Device, 22
Dictionaries, 22
Diligence, 14
Diplomas, 3, 9, 27, 28, 29, 57
Disability, 23
Disciplinary, 22
Disclosed, 30
Dishonesty, 3, 22
Dispatched, 17
Dissertations, 3, 16, 27
Doctoral Degrees Board, 16, 27, 28, 29
Documentation, 20
Documents, 9, 63
DP, 3, 9, 17
Draft, 18, 19, 54, 55
Duplicating, 19
Duration, 19, 21, 41, 43
E
Electronic, 14, 17, 21, 22, 61
Electronic Devices, 3, 21
Eligibility, 11
Emergency, 46
Error, 28, 29, 50, 57
Escort, 43, 46
Essays, 2, 4, 6, 8, 26, 31
EWA, 2, 10, 12, 13, 23, 35, 36, 58,
59
Examination, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32,
34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56,
58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 65
Examination Papers, 3, 15
Examination Without Attendance, 2, 13
Examinations
Committees, 3
Examinations Office, 17, 19, 29,
45
Examined, 2, 7, 8, 12, 14, 15, 32, 37,
47, 48, 54, 56
Examiner, 2, 7, 14, 15, 16, 21, 22, 23, 28, 29, 31, 32, 50,
52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 61, 62
Excluded, 30, 53
External, 2, 3, 7, 14, 15, 16, 18, 23,
28, 31, 32, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 60
External Examination, 2, 14
External
Examiners, 2, 3, 15, 16, 18, 52, 53, 55
Externally, 2, 7, 14, 15, 37
Extra Time, 3, 21, 23
F
Faculty, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 15, 16, 17,
23, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 36, 38, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54
Fails, 20, 27, 58
FEC, 3, 11, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 52,
54, 56
Fee, 16, 21, 32, 33, 34, 50
File, 19, 61, 62
Final, 4, 13, 37, 38
Final
Assessment, 6
Final Examination, 2, 6, 8, 9,
36
Final
Mark, 6, 7, 12, 27
Final
Results, 3, 4, 25, 29, 38, 55
Formal, 6, 7, 8, 17, 18, 19, 31, 33,
34
Formal Examination, 17, 18, 19
Format, 19
Formative, 6, 8
Forms Of, 2, 11
Forms Of Assessment, 6
Formula Sheets, 3, 22
G
General, 9, 11, 13, 14, 17, 20,
22, 23, 35, 46
Governing, 17, 46
Granted, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 17,
43
Grounds, 9, 11, 23, 29,
52, 56
Guide, 4, 52
Guidelines, 4, 14, 17, 24, 26, 35, 58, 60,
61
H
Handbook, 17, 20, 22, 25, 46
Head Of Department, 11, 15, 16, 17,
18, 20, 23, 24, 31, 38, 49, 50, 52, 53, 55, 56, 58
Hidden Notes, 43
Hierarchy, 4, 9, 35
HoD, 17, 18, 23, 24, 26, 52, 58
I
Identification, 3, 20
Illness, 45
Inclusion, 4, 39
Incomplete, 30, 53
Informed, 16, 17, 21, 23
Instructions, 2, 3, 4, 5, 13, 15, 24, 39, 41,
48, 65
Integrity, 13, 14, 22, 38, 53, 55
Invigilated, 2, 8
Invigilation, 3, 6, 13, 23, 24, 32, 42
Invigilators, 21, 23, 24, 40,
41, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48
Irregularities, 45
J
June And
November Examination Periods, 2, 6, 8
L
Language, 22
Learning, 6, 8, 23, 26, 32
Lecture, 4, 36
Length,4, 21, 34, 55
List, 17, 33, 42, 43, 45
Location, 2, 14, 38
Lockable Safe, 24
Locks, 18
Log, 5, 19, 60, 64
M
Maintaining, 17, 19
Make Changes, 4, 38
Mark, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 32, 39, 48,
50, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 61
Marking, 3, 4, 25, 26, 32, 37, 54, 55,
57
Master’s, 3, 16
Mid-Year, 4, 31, 39
Misreading, 3, 23
Module, 8
Multiple Choice, 19
Muslim, 43
N
Names, 3, 16, 23, 26, 27, 33, 43, 62
Nominee, 16, 20, 23, 24, 25
Not Allowed To Leave, 43
Noticeboards, 11, 13, 17, 33
Notifying Students, 2, 10
O
Obtained, 6, 7, 8, 29, 30, 32, 33, 52,
58
Office, 9, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,
20, 24, 29, 32, 33, 35, 38, 40, 42, 45, 46, 47, 51, 54
Official, 4, 30
Online, 2, 4,13, 14, 17, 60, 61, 65
Optional, 8
Organised, 8
Original, 9, 10, 11, 12
P
Paid, 16, 24, 50
Papers, 3, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21,22,
24, 25, 36, 40, 41, 42, 44, 45, 46, 47, 52, 54, 55, 63
Paramedic, 46
Pass, 29, 52
Password, 18, 33, 34, 60
Pattern, 4, 34
Payment, 3,16, 24, 32
PDF, 20
Penalty, 20
Period, 4, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 24, 31,
34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 46, 48
Permission, 7, 8, 14, 36, 38, 44
Phd, 3, 16, 27, 28
Postgraduate, 16, 26, 38
Potential, 16, 27
Practical, 4, 37
Practice, 10, 13, 16, 22, 31, 33, 61
Prayers, 43
Presence, 3, 21
Preserving, 3, 17
Principal, 3, 13, 20, 24, 39,
40, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 54, 61, 65
Principal Invigilators, 3, 4, 5, 13, 24, 39, 40, 49,
65
Principles, 4, 9, 34, 35
Printing, 5, 19, 63, 64
Process, 6, 8, 17, 19, 26, 52, 55
Produce, 20
Prohibited, 22
Proposals, 9, 27, 54, 57
Provision, 17, 35
Provisional, 3, 4, 28, 31, 36, 37, 38
Provisional Results, 3, 28, 31
Public, 4, 32
Publication, 3, 4, 25, 30, 31, 33, 36
Publish, 16, 17, 31, 32, 33, 52
Published, 4, 11, 13, 16, 17, 25, 29, 30,
31, 33, 37, 38, 39, 40, 53, 57, 65
Q
Qualifications, 32, 33
Qualifiers, 27, 28, 33
Qualifiers, 28
Question, 3, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 25, 36,
41, 47, 50, 54, 55, 57
Questions
Papers, 3, 16
R
Range Of Results, 3, 25
Rate, 24
Ratio, 24
Reading, 3, 21, 47, 63
Recommendation, 11, 38, 53, 56,
58
Records, 4, 7, 32, 35, 54
Records, 9, 33, 34, 46, 51, 54
Register, 19, 32, 33, 36, 43,
45, 47, 48
Registered, 4, 7, 33, 36, 51
Registrar, 17, 18, 20, 31
Reinstated, 21
Relatives, 19
Relevant, 17, 19, 20,
42, 43, 63
Remuneration, 24
Repeating, 13, 58
Report, 3, 16, 22, 24, 27, 29, 32, 33, 38, 43, 45, 46, 49,
55, 56
Representative,
19, 20, 21, 42, 43, 45, 55
Required, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19,
20, 22, 24, 26, 27, 35, 36, 40, 42, 45, 49, 51, 56, 58, 60, 61
Requirements, 2, 3, 9, 13, 14, 25, 27, 42,47,
57
Responsibility, 17, 36, 40, 53,
61
Responsible, 7, 10, 16, 17, 18,
20, 23, 24, 36, 42, 48, 53, 54
Results, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 20,
22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56,
57, 58, 59, 60, 61
Retention, 3, 23
Revised, 24
Risks, 14, 60
Rules, 3, 9, 11, 13, 14, 17, 20, 22,
23, 24, 27, 35, 43, 46, 47, 48, 50, 53, 56, 57, 58
S
Satisfactory, 20
Schedule, 2, 6, 8, 9, 10, 28,
32, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 54
Scheduling, 2, 4, 7, 10, 12, 39
Scripts, 3, 4, 21, 23, 26, 31, 32, 39,
43, 44, 45, 46, 48, 54, 55, 56, 57
Securely,
18, 19
Security, 3, 14, 17, 18, 60
Semester, 4, 12, 14, 17, 31, 32, 35, 36
Senate, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 34, 35, 38, 39, 56, 57, 58
Shredding, 19
Sign, 17, 19, 45, 54, 56
Sitting An Exam, 2, 7
Special, 8, 10, 13, 55, 56, 58,
59
Specify, 13, 22, 48, 62
Spoilt, 19
Status, 9, 27, 29, 52, 57
Storage, 19
Student Tutors, 3, 19, 25, 26
Student Wellness, 46
Students, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
16, 17, 20, 22, 23, 24, 27, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44,
45, 46, 47, 48, 53, 55, 56, 57, 59, 63
Submission, 4, 61
Submit, 7, 9, 20, 22, 55, 56, 65
Suffix, 8, 9
Summative, 2, 6, 8
Supervision, 8
Supplementary, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 23, 27, 28, 29, 30, 35, 37, 38, 52, 54, 56, 57, 58
System, 8, 20, 30, 31, 35
T
Take Home, 2, 13
Teaching, 6, 8, 17, 26, 32, 34, 38, 39
Technical, 14, 61, 65
Term, 2, 12, 13, 14, 15, 30, 32, 34,
53
Terms, 9, 13, 14, 20, 27, 50
The Use Of, 2, 15, 18
Theses, 3, 16, 27
Third Party, 3, 15, 18, 23,34
Third Term (Winter
And Summer Term), 2, 13
Timetable, 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 13, 21, 23,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 54, 59, 63
Toilet, 43, 47, 48
Training, 16, 24, 26
Transcripts, 30
Tutors, 24, 26
U
Unauthorised, 18, 22, 40, 42
Unclassified, 30
Undergraduate, 3, 7, 8, 16, 25, 26, 35, 36,
38, 39
Uploading, 20, 37, 58
Use Of, 3, 21, 22, 25, 41
V
Venue, 4, 11, 12, 13, 14, 21, 22, 23, 24, 35, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43,
44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 60, 61
Vula, 10, 13, 17, 20, 60
W
Warning, 20, 43, 44
Website, 10, 11, 12, 13, 21
Weighting, 27
Writing, 11, 12, 17, 19, 20, 25, 42,
43, 47
Written, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 13, 17, 20, 21,
22, 23, 25, 29, 31, 36, 38, 40, 41, 43, 44, 46, 47, 48, 52, 56
[1] Institutional offices Centre
for Innovation in Learning and Teaching and Information Communication and
Technology Services respectively.